Bell v. MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE
707 N.W.2d 597, 474 Mich. 989
This text of 707 N.W.2d 597 (Bell v. MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bell v. MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, 707 N.W.2d 597, 474 Mich. 989 (Mich. 2005).
Opinion
Audrey BELL, Leo Beasley, Brenda Black, Kimberly Blevins, Kathleen Conquest, Veronica Dorsette, Linda Facey, Jayne Floyd, Grace Jennings, Mary Oliver, Terri Sutton, Angela Turner, and Alcita Williams, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF the AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1023, Defendant-Appellant, and
Dentry Berry and Steven Malach, Personal Representative of the Estate of Yvonne Berry, Deceased, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 15, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH and CORRIGAN, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jackson v. LAKER GROUP, LLC
707 N.W.2d 597 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
707 N.W.2d 597, 474 Mich. 989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-michigan-council-25-of-american-federation-of-state-mich-2005.