Bell v. McNair

129 S.E. 94, 160 Ga. 853, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 280
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 14, 1925·No. No. 4972·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Hines, J.

1. A judge hearing a return to a writ of habeas corpus may, in his discretion, award the costs of the proceeding against either party, and may order execution issued thereon by the clerk. Penal Code, § 1312.

2. The language of the above section, “the costs of the proceeding,” embraces only charges fixed by statute, as compensation for services rendered by the officers of court in the progress of the habeas corpus cause; and does not authorize the judge hearing the return to the writ of habeas corpus to award against the applicant the attorney’s fees of counsel for the respondent. Davis v. State, 33 Ga. 531; Markham v. Ross, 73 Ga. 105.

3. It follows that the trial judge erred in awarding to the respondent attorney’s fees against the applicant for habeas corpus; and to this extent the judgment of the court below is reversed.

Judgment reversed m part.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. McNair, 129 S.E. 94, 160 Ga. 853, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 280 (Ga. 1925).

129 S.E. 94 (Bell v. McNair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Willis v. Price
353 S.E.2d 488 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1987)
Graham v. Hajosy
283 S.E.2d 683 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Harvey v. Harvey
259 S.E.2d 456 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)