Bell v. Marr
5 Va. 40, 1 Call 47, 1797 Va. LEXIS 6
Opinion
Delivered the resolution of the Court to the following effect:
That there was no difference between this case and that of Scott v. Hornsby, decided the other day ; except that the release here, was after the judgment, but in that case, it was before. That the Court, however, thought there was no distinction between the principles of the two cases; and consequently that the judgment, in this, as well as in that case, was right; and ought to be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell v. Marr, 5 Va. 40, 1 Call 47, 1797 Va. LEXIS 6 (Va. Ct. App. 1797).
5 Va. 40 (Bell v. Marr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hanna v. Philadelphia Asbestos Company
743 F.2d 996 (Third Circuit, 1984)
State ex rel. v. Purcell
5 S.E. 301 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1888)
Holt v. Lynch
18 W. Va. 567 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1881)
Paine v. Tutwiler
27 Va. 440 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1876)
Smith's Adm'r v. Charlton's Adm'r
7 Gratt. 425 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1851)
Ambler v. McMechen
1 D.C. 320 (District of Columbia, 1806)
Ambler v. McMechen
1 F. Cas. 591 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1806)