Bell v. Kelly

555 U.S. 55, 129 S. Ct. 393, 172 L. Ed. 2d 353, 2008 U.S. LEXIS 8345
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 17, 2008·No. 07-1223·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 07–1223

EDWARD NATHANIEL BELL, PETITIONER v.

LORETTA K. KELLY, WARDEN

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF

APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

[November 17, 2008]

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently

granted.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. Kelly, 555 U.S. 55, 129 S. Ct. 393, 172 L. Ed. 2d 353, 2008 U.S. LEXIS 8345 (2008).

555 U.S. 55 (Bell v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amazon Logistics, Inc. v. LIRC
2024 WI 15 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2024)
Jesse Gonzalez v. Robert Wong
667 F.3d 965 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
BARCO v. Tilton
694 F. Supp. 2d 1122 (C.D. California, 2010)
Wilson v. Workman
577 F.3d 1284 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)