Bell v. Keefe

12 La. Ann. 340
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 15, 1857
StatusPublished

This text of 12 La. Ann. 340 (Bell v. Keefe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. Keefe, 12 La. Ann. 340 (La. 1857).

Opinion

Spom’okd, J.

The Sheriff sues on the bond in his official capacity. If he has authority to receive the money on it, he has the authority to sue, as the defendants executed the bond in favor of the Sheriff. See Buisson v. Hyde, 17 La. 19.

If a transfer to the present plaintiff from his predecessor in office, by whom the bond was taken, were necessary, there is an endorsement which imports such a transfer upon the instrument; and the whole instrument was offered in evidence, without objection on the part of the defendants. Under the ruling of this court in the case of Maxwell v. Kennedy, 10 An. 798, the endorsements must be considered as proved.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buisson v. Hyde
17 La. 19 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1841)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 La. Ann. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-keefe-la-1857.