Bell v. Joseph
223 So. 2d 334, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5647
This text of 223 So. 2d 334 (Bell v. Joseph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bell v. Joseph, 223 So. 2d 334, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5647 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).
Opinion
This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record having been read and given full consideration, and Appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See McNulty v. Hurley (Fla.1957), 97 So.2d 185, 187; Romedy v. Johnston (Fla.App.1967), 193 So.2d 487, 491.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McNulty v. Hurley
97 So. 2d 185 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Romedy v. Johnston
193 So. 2d 487 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
223 So. 2d 334, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-joseph-fladistctapp-1969.