Bell v. Jones
This text of 561 F.3d 655 (Bell v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Derrick Bell, a pro se Michigan prisoner, petitions the court to rehear en banc an order denying him a certificate of appeala-bility. The motion has been referred to this panel of three judges, two of whom are senior judges, on which the original deciding judge does not sit, for a determination on the merits of the petition for rehearing. We conclude that the original deciding judge did not misapprehend or overlook any point of law or fact when he issued his order, and, accordingly, declines to rehear the matter. Fed. R.App. P. 40(a).
The Clerk shall now refer the matter to all of the active eligible members of the court for further proceedings on the suggestion for en banc rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
561 F.3d 655, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 7786, 2009 WL 982660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-jones-ca6-2009.