Bell v. Hubert

95 So. 350, 209 Ala. 22, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 305
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 18, 1923·No. 4 Div. 950.·Published

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

This case was submitted along with No. 949 (Genus Deal et al. v. Ethel Hubert et al., 96 South. 349 1 ), and presents the same questions for review. By agreement of counsel, the judgment in 949 becomes the judgment in this case, and, accordingly, the judgment of the trial court will be reversed and the cause remanded as in 949.

Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McGLELLAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
1

Ante, p. 18.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. Hubert, 95 So. 350, 209 Ala. 22, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 305 (Ala. 1923).

95 So. 350 (Bell v. Hubert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ford v. Hankins
96 So. 349 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)