Bell v. Hubert

95 So. 350, 209 Ala. 22, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 305
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 18, 1923
Docket4 Div. 950.
StatusPublished

This text of 95 So. 350 (Bell v. Hubert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. Hubert, 95 So. 350, 209 Ala. 22, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 305 (Ala. 1923).

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

This case was submitted along with No. 949 (Genus Deal et al. v. Ethel Hubert et al., 96 South. 349 1 ), and presents the same questions for review. By agreement of counsel, the judgment in 949 becomes the judgment in this case, and, accordingly, the judgment of the trial court will be reversed and the cause remanded as in 949.

Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McGLELLAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
1

Ante, p. 18.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ford v. Hankins
96 So. 349 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 So. 350, 209 Ala. 22, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-hubert-ala-1923.