Bell v. Hamilton Cty. Courthouse

2017 Ohio 6964, 78 N.E.3d 906, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1404
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 26, 2017
Docket2017-0625
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 6964 (Bell v. Hamilton Cty. Courthouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. Hamilton Cty. Courthouse, 2017 Ohio 6964, 78 N.E.3d 906, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1404 (Ohio 2017).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 Ohio 6964, 78 N.E.3d 906, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-hamilton-cty-courthouse-ohio-2017.