Bell v. First Natl. Bank of Bradenton

Supreme Court of Florida

Bell v. First Natl. Bank of Bradenton

3 So. 2d 127, 147 Fla. 528, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1316

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 17, 1941·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal brings for review final decree in favor of the defendant on the pleadings and testimony taken and report of special master.

A careful perusal of the record discloses that the controlling question is whether or not the evidence sustains the decree.

Our conclusion is that the decree is supported by a preponderance of the evidence and, on consideration of the entire record, no reversible error being made to appear, the decree is affirmed.

So ordered.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appeal brings for review final decree in favor of the defendant on the pleadings and testimony taken and report of special master.

A careful perusal of the record discloses that the controlling question is whether or not the evidence sustains the decree.

Our conclusion is that the decree is supported by a preponderance of the evidence and, on consideration of the entire record, no reversible error being made to appear, the decree is affirmed.

So ordered.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur.

Bell v. First Natl. Bank of Bradenton, 3 So. 2d 127, 147 Fla. 528, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1316 (Fla. 1941).

Pincite

3 So. 2d 127 (Bell v. First Natl. Bank of Bradenton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.