Bell v. F. C. Vanzandt

54 Tex. 150, 1880 Tex. LEXIS 139
Texas Supreme Court·Decided December 14, 1880·No. Case No. 990·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Moore, Chief Justice.

The citation served upon the plaintiff in error authorized the judgment by de[152]*152fault entered against Mm. The citation in tMs case is unlike those in the cases to wMch we are referred by counsel. While-it may not be in all respects strictly regular and formal, yet it plainly shows who are the defendants.

But the judgment does not follow the petition. In the original and amended petitions, F. 0. Vanzandt, as executrix of the estate of Isaac Vanzandt, is the sole and only plaintiff, yet the judgment is m favor of her and E. M. Vanzandt and others named m the judgment as heirs of Isaac Vanzandt. And for this error the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

[Opirnon delivered December 14, 1880.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. F. C. Vanzandt, 54 Tex. 150, 1880 Tex. LEXIS 139 (Tex. 1880).

54 Tex. 150 (Bell v. F. C. Vanzandt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robertson v. Robertson
608 S.W.2d 245 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Edwards v. Hatch
106 S.W.2d 741 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Amarillo-Panhandle Development Corp. v. Ellis
10 S.W.2d 733 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Green v. Brown
15 S.W. 37 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1890)