Bell v. English
3 F. Cas. 102, 4 Cranch 332
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided October 15, 1834·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
(nem. con.) refused to discharge the boy, being of opinion that the orphans’ court had jurisdiction to bind out orphan children; and that the binding was in the usual form in which that court exercised its jurisdiction. See Hines v. Hewitt, [Case No. 6,520.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell v. English, 3 F. Cas. 102, 4 Cranch 332 (circtddc 1834).
3 F. Cas. 102 (Bell v. English) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The Towanda
215 F. 232 (E.D. New York, 1914)
Appeal of Milwaukee Dry Dock Co.
69 F. 1009 (Seventh Circuit, 1895)
Putnam v. The Young America
30 F. 789 (S.D. New York, 1887)
The J. W. Tucker
20 F. 129 (S.D. New York, 1884)
Murray v. Laften
15 Mo. 621 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1852)