Bell v. Davis

42 Ala. 460
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 42 Ala. 460 (Bell v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. Davis, 42 Ala. 460 (Ala. 1868).

Opinion

A. J. WALKER, C. J.-

-The court below erred in charging the jury, that the title to land does not pass by an execution sale, if the land was exempt, notwithstanding the defendant set up no claim to the exemption until after the sale. We think it very clearly deducible from the home[462]*462stead law, that its benefit is lost if tbe exemption is not brought to the notice of the proper person before the-sale. — (Revised Code, §§ 2880, 2881; Simpson v. Simpson, 30 Ala. 225; Gresham v. Walker, 10 Ala. 270.) The fact that the defendant in execution did not know of the levy can not affect the principle.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stephen-Putney Shoe Co. v. White
55 So. 503 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Lahr v. Ulmer
60 N.E. 1009 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1901)
Jarrell v. Payne
75 Ala. 577 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)
Clark v. Spencer
75 Ala. 49 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1883)
Henderson's Adm'r v. Tucker
70 Ala. 381 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1881)
Sherry v. Brown
66 Ala. 51 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1880)
Martin v. Lile
63 Ala. 406 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1879)
Brown v. Leitch
60 Ala. 313 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)
McGuire v. Van Pelt
55 Ala. 344 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1876)
Steele v. Moody
53 Ala. 418 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)
Rottenberry v. Pipes
53 Ala. 447 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 Ala. 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-davis-ala-1868.