Bell v. Davis

42 Ala. 460
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1868·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

A. J. WALKER, C. J.-

-The court below erred in charging the jury, that the title to land does not pass by an execution sale, if the land was exempt, notwithstanding the defendant set up no claim to the exemption until after the sale. We think it very clearly deducible from the home[462] stead law, that its benefit is lost if tbe exemption is not brought to the notice of the proper person before the-sale. — (Revised Code, §§ 2880, 2881; Simpson v. Simpson, 30 Ala. 225; Gresham v. Walker, 10 Ala. 270.) The fact that the defendant in execution did not know of the levy can not affect the principle.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. Davis, 42 Ala. 460 (Ala. 1868).

42 Ala. 460 (Bell v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stephen-Putney Shoe Co. v. White
55 So. 503 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Lahr v. Ulmer
60 N.E. 1009 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1901)
Jarrell v. Payne
75 Ala. 577 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)
Clark v. Spencer
75 Ala. 49 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1883)
Henderson's Adm'r v. Tucker
70 Ala. 381 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1881)
Sherry v. Brown
66 Ala. 51 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1880)
Martin v. Lile
63 Ala. 406 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1879)
Brown v. Leitch
60 Ala. 313 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)
McGuire v. Van Pelt
55 Ala. 344 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1876)
Steele v. Moody
53 Ala. 418 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)
Rottenberry v. Pipes
53 Ala. 447 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)