Bell v. City of Raleigh

173 S.E. 581, 206 N.C. 275, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 164
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 21, 1934·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

CONNOR, J.

On 1 August, 1932, the plaintiff was at work on a school building owned by the Raleigh Township School Committee. He had been assigned to said work by the Wake County Welfare Department, and was receiving from the North Carolina Emergency Relief Administration the sum of $2.25 per week, as relief. While at work, plaintiff suffered an injury by an accident which arose out of and in the course of his work.

The plaintiff was not an employee of the defendants or of either of them at the time of his injury, within the meaning of that word as used in the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act. See Jackson v. Relief Administration, ante, 274. There is no error in the judgment of the Superior Court, reversing the award of the Industrial Commission, and dismissing the proceeding. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. City of Raleigh, 173 S.E. 581, 206 N.C. 275, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 164 (N.C. 1934).

173 S.E. 581 (Bell v. City of Raleigh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnhardt v. City of Concord
196 S.E. 310 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Oswalt v. Lucas County
270 N.W. 847 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1937)
Clark v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau
262 N.W. 249 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1935)
Garney v. Department of Labor & Industries
41 P.2d 400 (Washington Supreme Court, 1935)
Mayze v. Town of Forest City
176 S.E. 270 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Village of West Milwaukee v. Industrial Commission
255 N.W. 728 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1934)