Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Bell v. City of New York

Bell v. City of New York

179 A.D.2d 639, 579 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 224
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 13, 1992
StatusPublished

This text of 179 A.D.2d 639 (Bell v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. City of New York, 179 A.D.2d 639, 579 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 224 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Under the circumstances of this case, we find that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the petitioner’s application for leave to file a late notice of claim (see, Matter of Harris v Dormitory Auth., 168 AD2d 560; Rosenblatt v City of New York, 160 AD2d 927; Baldeo v City of New York, 127 AD2d 809; Matter of Cannistra v Town of Putnam Val., 124 AD2d 801). Kunzeman, J. P., Balletta, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cannistra v. Town of Putnam Valley
124 A.D.2d 801 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Baldeo v. City of New York
127 A.D.2d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Rosenblatt v. City of New York
160 A.D.2d 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Harris v. Dormitory Authority
168 A.D.2d 560 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 A.D.2d 639, 579 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1992.