Bell v. . Byrum

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Bell v. . Byrum

144 S.E. 923, 196 N.C. 798, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 396

DecidedSeptember 12, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 144 S.E. 923 (Bell v. . Byrum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. . Byrum, 144 S.E. 923, 196 N.C. 798, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 396 (N.C. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Pek Cublam.

The plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for alleged breach of a written contract under the terms of which the plaintiff was to furnish the defendants certain seed potatoes, fertilizer, barrels, and sufficient poison for the crop, and the defendants were to cultivate, tend, and gather the crop at maturity and make delivery thereof to the plaintiff at Elizabeth City “at such time in June, 1927, between the 5th and 15th, that the potatoes turn or yield fourteen to one, said digging in any event to be between said dates, except as otherwise provided.” The defendants denied the material allegations of the complaint and set up *799 a counterclaim. In response to tbe issues tbe jury found tbat tbe defendants bad failed to comply witb tbe contract, tbat tbe breach bad not been waived by tbe plaintiff, and assessed damages both for tbe plaintiff and for tbe defendants on tbeir counterclaim.

In our examination of tbe record we bave discovered no reversible error.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pek Cublam.

The plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for alleged breach of a written contract under the terms of which the plaintiff was to furnish the defendants certain seed potatoes, fertilizer, barrels, and sufficient poison for the crop, and the defendants were to cultivate, tend, and gather the crop at maturity and make delivery thereof to the plaintiff at Elizabeth City “at such time in June, 1927, between the 5th and 15th, that the potatoes turn or yield fourteen to one, said digging in any event to be between said dates, except as otherwise provided.” The defendants denied the material allegations of the complaint and set up *799 a counterclaim. In response to tbe issues tbe jury found tbat tbe defendants bad failed to comply witb tbe contract, tbat tbe breach bad not been waived by tbe plaintiff, and assessed damages both for tbe plaintiff and for tbe defendants on tbeir counterclaim.

In our examination of tbe record we bave discovered no reversible error.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 S.E. 923, 196 N.C. 798, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-byrum-nc-1928.