Bell v. Broward County Personnel Review Board/Agent Rosenberg

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bell v. Broward County Personnel Review Board/Agent Rosenberg

691 So. 2d 514, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2121, 1997 WL 107245

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 12, 1997

DocketNo. 96-1259

StatusPublished

This text of 691 So. 2d 514 (Bell v. Broward County Personnel Review Board/Agent Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. Broward County Personnel Review Board/Agent Rosenberg, 691 So. 2d 514, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2121, 1997 WL 107245 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review an order of the trial court denying a motion styled as one seeking relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b). Because we are without jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal.

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) only permits a party to seek relief from a “final judgment, decree, order or proceed-ing_” Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b). The motion filed by the appellant sought relief from an order “denying without prejudice” Bek’s motion for final judgment. As such an order is not final, relief could neither have been sought nor granted pursuant to rule 1.540(b). Thus, the order which Appellant seeks to have this court review is not an order entered on a motion filed pursuant to 1.540(b) and, as a result, this court does not have jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(5). See Hi-Tech Mktg. Group, Inc. v. Thiem, 659 So.2d 479 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Piper Aircraft Co. v. Whyham, 455 So.2d 650 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Nolan’s Towing & Recovery v. Marino Trucking, Inc., 581 So.2d 644 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Further, the order is not a final order appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

FARMER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review an order of the trial court denying a motion styled as one seeking relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b). Because we are without jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal.

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) only permits a party to seek relief from a “final judgment, decree, order or proceed-ing_” Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b). The motion filed by the appellant sought relief from an order “denying without prejudice” Bek’s motion for final judgment. As such an order is not final, relief could neither have been sought nor granted pursuant to rule 1.540(b). Thus, the order which Appellant seeks to have this court review is not an order entered on a motion filed pursuant to 1.540(b) and, as a result, this court does not have jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(5). See Hi-Tech Mktg. Group, Inc. v. Thiem, 659 So.2d 479 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Piper Aircraft Co. v. Whyham, 455 So.2d 650 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Nolan’s Towing & Recovery v. Marino Trucking, Inc., 581 So.2d 644 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Further, the order is not a final order appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

FARMER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

691 So. 2d 514, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2121, 1997 WL 107245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-broward-county-personnel-review-boardagent-rosenberg-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack