Bell v. Brooks

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 6, 2005
• Docket: 05-6524
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6524

MARK ANTHONY BELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MR. BROOKS, Warden; JOHN DOE, Institutional Doctor; MS. APPANTE, Hospital Administrator,

Defendants - Appellees, and

MS. APONTAY, Medical Administrator,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-938-1)

Submitted: September 29, 2005 Decided: October 6, 2005

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Anthony Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Anita Claire Snyder, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Mark Anthony Bell appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Bell v. Brooks, No.

CA-03-938-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

- 2 -