Bell v. Brooks

144 F. App'x 362

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mark Anthony Bell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens

* complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bell v. Brooks, No. CA-03-938-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).