Bell v. Bell

New York Supreme Court

Bell v. Bell

1 How. Pr. 71

DecidedFebruary 15, 1845

StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 71 (Bell v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. Bell, 1 How. Pr. 71 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

Nelson, Chief Justice.

We have decided that point against you.

The plaintiff then read affidavit, showing that after the fi. fa. was issued and a levy made by the deputy sheriff, the deputy sheriff told defendant that he had received notice from plaintiff’s attorney that some of the money to be collected must be paid to plaintiff’s attorney, and not to the plaintiff. To this the defendant replied, that the deputy sheriff must not pay any thing to plaintiff’s attorney, but must pay all he collected on the fi. fa. to the plaintiff in person.

Nelson, Chief Justice.—That was a waiver of the irregularity.

Decision.—Motion denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nelson, Chief Justice.

We have decided that point against you.

The plaintiff then read affidavit, showing that after the fi. fa. was issued and a levy made by the deputy sheriff, the deputy sheriff told defendant that he had received notice from plaintiff’s attorney that some of the money to be collected must be paid to plaintiff’s attorney, and not to the plaintiff. To this the defendant replied, that the deputy sheriff must not pay any thing to plaintiff’s attorney, but must pay all he collected on the fi. fa. to the plaintiff in person.

Nelson, Chief Justice.—That was a waiver of the irregularity.

Decision.—Motion denied, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 How. Pr. 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-bell-nysupct-1845.