Bell v. Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bell v. Bell

56 A.D.2d 832, 391 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11149

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 7, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 832 (Bell v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. Bell, 56 A.D.2d 832, 391 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which the defendant wife was granted a judgment of divorce, the parties cross-appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated July 20, 1976, which (1) denied plaintiff’s motion, inter alia, for a downward modification of the ■ support provisions of the judgment and (2) granted the branch of defendant’s application which sought an upward modification of support, but denied the branch of her application which sought counsel fees. Order modified, on the facts, by deleting therefrom the provision which directs plaintiff to pay defendant $175 per week for her support and substituting therefor a provision that plaintiff shall pay defendant $150 per week for her support. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The increase [833]*833in support payments was not warranted under the facts herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Damiani and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action in which the defendant wife was granted a judgment of divorce, the parties cross-appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated July 20, 1976, which (1) denied plaintiff’s motion, inter alia, for a downward modification of the ■ support provisions of the judgment and (2) granted the branch of defendant’s application which sought an upward modification of support, but denied the branch of her application which sought counsel fees. Order modified, on the facts, by deleting therefrom the provision which directs plaintiff to pay defendant $175 per week for her support and substituting therefor a provision that plaintiff shall pay defendant $150 per week for her support. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The increase [833]*833in support payments was not warranted under the facts herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Damiani and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 832, 391 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-bell-nyappdiv-1977.