Bell v. Bell

115 S.E. 645, 154 Ga. 850, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 413
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 25, 1923·No. No. 3157·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

When a husband buys land and pays the purchase money thereof, but has a deed made to his wife, the law raises the presumption of a gift by the husband to his wife. Jackson v. Jackson, 150 Ga. 544 (104 S. E. 236); Kimbrough v. Kimbrough, 99 Ga. 134 (25 S. E. 176). There being no allegation in the petition in this ease denying that there was any intention on the part of the husband to make a gift of the land to his wife, or any facts stated which would rebut such presumption, the court below did not err in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, O. J., and, Gilbert, J., dissenting. John E. Drake and W. V. Ouster, for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. Bell, 115 S.E. 645, 154 Ga. 850, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 413 (Ga. 1923).

115 S.E. 645 (Bell v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Youngblood v. Logan
88 S.E.2d 173 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Mills v. Williams
67 S.E.2d 212 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Williams v. Thomas
38 S.E.2d 603 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)