Bell v. Atlanta Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bell v. Atlanta Telephone & Telegraph Co.

84 S.E. 175, 15 Ga. App. 680, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 36

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 3, 1915

Docket5675

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 84 S.E. 175 (Bell v. Atlanta Telephone & Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bell v. Atlanta Telephone & Telegraph Co., 84 S.E. 175, 15 Ga. App. 680, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 36 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. A second affidavit of illegality is not maintainable if based on the same facts that the first affidavit was based upon. The fact that the first affidavit was dismissed, without a trial of the issues raised or attempted to be raised by it, does not make an exception to the rule. Civil Code, § 6288; Hurt v. Mason, 2 Ga. 367; Leonard v. Collier, 53 Ga. 388 (3) ; Burnett v. Fouche, 77 Ga. 550; Fuller v. Vining, 87 Ga. 600 (13 S. E. 635) ; Baker v. Smith, 91 Ga. 143 (16 S. E. 967) ; Binder v. Ragsdale, 100 Ga. 400 (28 S. E. 165); Cone Export &c. Co. v. McCalla, 113 Ga. 17 (38 S. E. 336).

2. There was no error in dismissing the second affidavit of illegality, nor in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, J.

1. A second affidavit of illegality is not maintainable if based on the same facts that the first affidavit was based upon. The fact that the first affidavit was dismissed, without a trial of the issues raised or attempted to be raised by it, does not make an exception to the rule. Civil Code, § 6288; Hurt v. Mason, 2 Ga. 367; Leonard v. Collier, 53 Ga. 388 (3) ; Burnett v. Fouche, 77 Ga. 550; Fuller v. Vining, 87 Ga. 600 (13 S. E. 635) ; Baker v. Smith, 91 Ga. 143 (16 S. E. 967) ; Binder v. Ragsdale, 100 Ga. 400 (28 S. E. 165); Cone Export &c. Co. v. McCalla, 113 Ga. 17 (38 S. E. 336).

2. There was no error in dismissing the second affidavit of illegality, nor in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 S.E. 175, 15 Ga. App. 680, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-atlanta-telephone-telegraph-co-gactapp-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack