Bell v. Atlanta Cooperage Co.
This text of 173 S.E.2d 427 (Bell v. Atlanta Cooperage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the Civil Practice Act (Ga. L. 1966, p. 609, as amended; Code Ann. Title 81A), a complaint should not be dismissed unless the averments disclose with certainty that the plaintiff would not be entitled to relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of such claim. Harper v. DeFreitas, 117 Ga. App. 236, 238 (160 SE2d 260). The petition in the present case being amply sufficient to meet the requirements of the Act, and not affirmatively disclosing that complainant is not entitled to relief under facts provable under the allegations made, the trial court erred in sustaining the motion to dismiss.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 S.E.2d 427, 121 Ga. App. 207, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 1172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-atlanta-cooperage-co-gactapp-1970.