Bell v. Assignee of Reading

2 N.J.L. 143
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1806·Published

Opinion

[*] Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— Delivered the opinion [105] of the court. This instrument is not assignable in law; the assignee cannot maintain an action thereupon in his own name; nor if he could, would an action of debt lie: it must be of covenant broken.

Let the judgment be reversed.

Cited in Sheppard v. Stites, 2 Halst. 90.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. Assignee of Reading, 2 N.J.L. 143 (N.J. 1806).

2 N.J.L. 143 (Bell v. Assignee of Reading) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.