Bell Telephone Co. v. Van Dyke
296 U.S. 533, 56 S. Ct. 93
Opinion
The appeal herein, is dismissed for the reason that the decision of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 162, 165; Utley v. St. Petersburg, 292 U. S. 106, 111; Mobile, J. & K. C. R. Co. v. Mississippi, 210 U. S. 187, 204; Lowry v. Silver City G. & S. Mining Co., 179 U. S. 196, 198.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell Telephone Co. v. Van Dyke, 296 U.S. 533, 56 S. Ct. 93 (1935).
296 U.S. 533 (Bell Telephone Co. v. Van Dyke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
473 A.2d 997 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Gause v. Detroit Trust Co.
297 U.S. 695 (Supreme Court, 1936)