Bell Telephone Co. v. Commonwealth ex rel. Baltimore & Ohio Telegraph Co.
3 A. 825, 2 Sadler 299, 17 Week. No. 505, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 613
Opinion
We have carefully examined the record in this case, and have-given due consideration to the able argument of the counsel for the plaintiff in error; yet we are not able to discover any error in the-conclusion at which the learned judge arrived. His opinion contains a correct statement of the law, and vindicates the.judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell Telephone Co. v. Commonwealth ex rel. Baltimore & Ohio Telegraph Co., 3 A. 825, 2 Sadler 299, 17 Week. No. 505, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 613 (Pa. 1886).
3 A. 825 (Bell Telephone Co. v. Commonwealth ex rel. Baltimore & Ohio Telegraph Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rubin v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
177 A.2d 128 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
Pennsylvania Publications, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
36 A.2d 777 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
Perry County Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service Commission
108 A. 659 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Cochranton Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission
70 Pa. Super. 212 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
Postal Cable Telegraph Co. v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.
177 F. 726 (M.D. Tennessee, 1910)
State ex. rel. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Delaware & A. Telegraph & Telephone Co.
47 F. 633 (Circuit Court of Delaware, 1891)