Bell Telephone Co. v. Commonwealth ex rel. Baltimore & Ohio Telegraph Co.
This text of 3 A. 825 (Bell Telephone Co. v. Commonwealth ex rel. Baltimore & Ohio Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have carefully examined the record in this case, and have-given due consideration to the able argument of the counsel for the plaintiff in error; yet we are not able to discover any error in the-conclusion at which the learned judge arrived. His opinion contains a correct statement of the law, and vindicates the.judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 A. 825, 2 Sadler 299, 17 Week. No. 505, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-telephone-co-v-commonwealth-ex-rel-baltimore-ohio-telegraph-co-pa-1886.