Bell Telephone Co. v. Commonwealth ex rel. Baltimore & Ohio Telegraph Co.

3 A. 825, 2 Sadler 299, 17 Week. No. 505, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 613
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 19, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 3 A. 825 (Bell Telephone Co. v. Commonwealth ex rel. Baltimore & Ohio Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell Telephone Co. v. Commonwealth ex rel. Baltimore & Ohio Telegraph Co., 3 A. 825, 2 Sadler 299, 17 Week. No. 505, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 613 (Pa. 1886).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We have carefully examined the record in this case, and have-given due consideration to the able argument of the counsel for the plaintiff in error; yet we are not able to discover any error in the-conclusion at which the learned judge arrived. His opinion contains a correct statement of the law, and vindicates the.judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rubin v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
177 A.2d 128 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
Pennsylvania Publications, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
36 A.2d 777 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
Perry County Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service Commission
108 A. 659 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Cochranton Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission
70 Pa. Super. 212 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 A. 825, 2 Sadler 299, 17 Week. No. 505, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-telephone-co-v-commonwealth-ex-rel-baltimore-ohio-telegraph-co-pa-1886.