Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Rochester
90 N.Y.S. 1088
Opinion
Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Held that, without passing upon the" merits upon the facts in this case, the discretionary order refusing to vacate the injunction pendente lite should be sustained.
SPRING, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Rochester, 90 N.Y.S. 1088 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).
90 N.Y.S. 1088 (Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Rochester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.