Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Rochester
90 N.Y.S. 1088
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 11, 1904
StatusPublished
This text of 90 N.Y.S. 1088 (Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Rochester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Rochester, 90 N.Y.S. 1088 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Held that, without passing upon the" merits upon the facts in this case, the discretionary order refusing to vacate the injunction pendente lite should be sustained.
SPRING, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
90 N.Y.S. 1088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-telephone-co-v-city-of-rochester-nyappdiv-1904.