Bell Shoe Stores, Inc. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
This text of 200 S.E. 367 (Bell Shoe Stores, Inc. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action is one arising out of a written lease and a dispute between the parties as to the exact cause of the damage to plaintiff’s stock of goods following a heavy rain on the night of 19 June, 1936. The jury has resolved the disputed matters of fact in favor of the plaintiff. "We have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. The evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 S.E. 367, 214 N.C. 848, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-shoe-stores-inc-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nc-1939.