Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. ASMedia Technology, Inc.

• Court: District Court, S.D. New York
• Decided: January 24, 2023
• Docket: 1:22-cv-09260
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

~ 1 Chris R. Schmidt e | S e D 913.777.5644 | O 913.777.5600 intellectual property law chris.schmidt@eriselP.com USDC SDNY January 23, 2023 DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FIL VIA_ECEF DOC #: . DATE FILED:_01/24/202. The Honorable Valerie E. Caproni United States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: | ASMedia’s Motion to Seal Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. ASMedia Technology, Inc., 1:22-cv-09260-VEC Dear Judge Caproni, This firm represents Defendant ASMedia Technology, Inc. in the above-referenced action. ASMedia respectfully requests the Court’s file redacted versions of ASMedia’s Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion to Dismiss and its accompanying Declaration of Mr. Jerry Wang. At the time of this filing, Bell stated it was reviewing ASMedia’s redaction request. Redaction is appropriate because these documents include “sensitive commercial information[.]” PDV Sweeny, Inc. v. ConocoPhillips Co., No. 14-cv-5183 AJN, 2014 WL 4973916, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2014). Specifically, the Memorandum and support Declaration reference specific units sales information and a specific customer of ASMedia for those unit sales. There is a significant risk that third parties would use the sensitive commercial information contained therein to compete with ASMedia. Gelb v. Am. Tel & Tel. Co., 813 F. Supp. 1022, 1035 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) (stating that “defendants’ assertion that its competitors . . . could use [the information] to do competitive injury to the defendants is . . . a sufficient basis” for sealing). The competitive injury to ASMedia would be permanent. Thus, the requested redaction is necessary to protect ASMedia’s confidential business information. See Nixon v. Warner Commce’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978) (noting that courts often seal “sources of business information that might harm a litigant’s competitive strategy”). Pursuant to this Court’s Individual Rules of Practice, the Court’s standing order at 19-mc- 00583, and ECF Rules & Instructions at section 6, ASMedia is separately filing highlighted versions of the Memorandum and supporting Declaration showing the proposed redactions, along with redacted versions of the same. Respectfully,

Chris R. Schmidt

Plaintiff must file any response to Defendant's request not later than Wednesday, January 25, 2023. SO ORDERED.

01/24/2023 HON. VALERIE CAPRONI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE