Bell (Pedro) Vs. State
This text of Bell (Pedro) Vs. State (Bell (Pedro) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
PEDRO TYRONE BELL, No. 79582 Appellant, vs .
THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. SEP 2 7 2019 ELI A. BROWN CL PREME RT
EPUTY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Stefany Miley, Judge. This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court entered the judginent of conviction on April 6, 2016. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until September 5, 2019, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). "[Aln untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Picket. , J. Pickering
, J. Parraguirre Cadish cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge Pedro Tyrone Bell Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
442P. (01 1947A 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bell (Pedro) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-pedro-vs-state-nev-2019.