Bell, M., Pets. v. Commonwealth
This text of Bell, M., Pets. v. Commonwealth (Bell, M., Pets. v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
MONTANA BELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON : No. 63 EM 2023 BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY : SITUATED, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2024, the “Application for the Exercise of the
Court’s King [sic] Bench Power of Extraordinary Jurisdiction/Relief” and “Petition for Writ
of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief” are DENIED.
Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bell, M., Pets. v. Commonwealth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-m-pets-v-commonwealth-pa-2024.