Bell, M., Pets. v. Commonwealth
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
MONTANA BELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON : No. 63 EM 2023 BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY : SITUATED, : :
Petitioners : : :
v. : : :
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : :
Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2024, the “Application for the Exercise of the
Court’s King [sic] Bench Power of Extraordinary Jurisdiction/Relief” and “Petition for Writ
of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief” are DENIED.
Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell, M., Pets. v. Commonwealth (Bell, M., Pets. v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.