Bell, Ex Parte Calandra Denise

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 23, 2007
DocketAP-75,682
StatusPublished

This text of Bell, Ex Parte Calandra Denise (Bell, Ex Parte Calandra Denise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell, Ex Parte Calandra Denise, (Tex. 2007).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. AP-75,681; AP-75,682; AP-75,683

EX PARTE CALANDRA DENISE BELL, Applicant



ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. F01-40466-KQ, F01-75851-MQ, F01-21311-MQ

IN THE 204th DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two separate forgeries, and credit card abuse, and sentenced to ten years' imprisonment in each cause. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed her convictions. Bell v. State, Nos. 05-02-00490, 00493, 00494-CR (Tex. Crim. App.-Dallas, delivered August 21, 2003, no pet.).

Applicant contends, inter alia, that her appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that her convictions had been affirmed and failed to advise her of her right to petition for discretionary review pro se.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that her convictions had been affirmed and failed to advise her of her right to petition for discretionary appeal pro se. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgments of the Fifth Court of Appeals in Cause Nos. 05-02-00490, 00493, 00494-CR that affirmed her convictions in Case Nos. F01-40466-KQ, F01-75851-MQ, F01-21311 from the 204th Judicial District Court of Dallas County. Applicant shall file her petitions for discretionary review with the Fifth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court's mandate issues.

All other claims are dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).



Delivered: May 23, 2007

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bell, Ex Parte Calandra Denise, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-ex-parte-calandra-denise-texcrimapp-2007.