Bell Corbett v. Noosa Pest Management LLC
This text of Bell Corbett v. Noosa Pest Management LLC (Bell Corbett v. Noosa Pest Management LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:22-cv-460-MOC-SCR MARY L. CORBETT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) VS. ) ORDER ) NOOSA PEST MANAGEMENT, LLC, ) ) ) Defendant. ) □□ THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Second Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant. (Doc. No. 33). Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint on June 12, 2024. (Doc. No. 43). Because Plaintiff has filed a Second Amended Complaint, the pending motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint is moot. See Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001) (“The general rule ... is that an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, rendering the original pleading of no effect.”); Turner v. Kight, 192 F. Supp. 2d 391, 397 (D. Md. 2002) (denying as moot motions to dismiss original complaint on grounds that amended complaint superseded original complaint). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. No. 33), is DENIED as moot. Signed: September 4, 2024
akierter SS Max O. Cogburn Jr , United States District Judge Toalg ht
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bell Corbett v. Noosa Pest Management LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-corbett-v-noosa-pest-management-llc-ncwd-2024.