Bell-Boston v. Hilton

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2010·No. 09-2288·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2288

KAREEMAH BELL-BOSTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GLENETTE M. HILTON, Assistant Chief of Police for Administration, University of the District of Columbia,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01227-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 20, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kareemah Bell-Boston, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kareemah Bell-Boston appeals the district court’s

order dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction and improper venue. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Bell-Boston v. Hilton,

No. 1:09-cv-01227-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell-Boston v. Hilton, (4th Cir. 2010).

Bell-Boston v. Hilton (Bell-Boston v. Hilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.