Bell, B., Pets. v. Wilkinsburg SD
This text of Bell, B., Pets. v. Wilkinsburg SD (Bell, B., Pets. v. Wilkinsburg SD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
BETTY BELL, AN ADULT INDIVIDUAL, : No. 75 WAL 2024 AND PROPEL SCHOOLS, D/B/A PROPEL : CHARTER SCHOOL - HOMESTEAD, : PROPEL CHARTER SCHOOL - SUNRISE, : Petition for Allowance of Appeal D/B/A PROPEL BRADDOCK HILLS, : from the Order of the PROPEL CHARTER SCHOOL - PITCAIRN, : Commonwealth Court AND PROPEL CHARTER SCHOOL - : HAZELWOOD, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : WILKINSBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
(1) Whether, in a matter of first impression, the Commonwealth Court erred in interpreting 24 P.S. §17-1726-A to permit unequal treatment of school-aged students in the Commonwealth depending on whether the students are enrolled in a public charter school or in a traditional public school?
Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bell, B., Pets. v. Wilkinsburg SD, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-b-pets-v-wilkinsburg-sd-pa-2024.