Belknap v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc.

462 N.E.2d 125, 61 N.Y.2d 802, 473 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4078
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 16, 1984·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The April, 1968, corporate resolution of Laird, Bissel & Meeds, Inc. (LBM), on which plaintiffs’ decedent’s right to a pension is grounded, provided that “[i]n case of merger, the firm would attempt to have the pension continued, but could not, of course, guarantee that this would be the case.” As a consequence of this limitation, at the moment LBM *804 merged with defendant, LBM’s responsibility to provide a pension could not be deemed a “debt, liability, [or] duty” that defendant agreed or was obligation to assume under section 1 (b) (ii) of the merger agreement. Insofar as that agreement was otherwise silent on the issue whether defendant had contracted to provide the pension, it was proper to admit extrinsic evidence that was probative of the parties’ intent (see Bethlehem Steel Co. v Turner Constr. Co., 2 NY2d 456, 460).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye concur; Judge Simons taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belknap v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc., 462 N.E.2d 125, 61 N.Y.2d 802, 473 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4078 (N.Y. 1984).

462 N.E.2d 125 (Belknap v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carlson v. Am. Int'l Grp., Inc.
89 N.E.3d 490 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 2017)
Studio A Showroom, LLC v. Yoon
99 A.D.3d 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Hart v. Kinney Drugs, Inc.
67 A.D.3d 1154 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Wallace Industries, Inc. v. Salt City Energy Venture
233 A.D.2d 543 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
1058 Corp. v. Enrique Ergas
174 A.D.2d 415 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)