Belknap County v. Laconia
116 A. 434, 80 N.H. 251, 1922 N.H. LEXIS 1
Opinion
As the defendant agreed that the finding of the superior court should be final, it takes nothing by its exception; and that would also be true, if it had not made that agreement. P. S., c. 252, s. 31; Laws 1903, c. 28, s. 2, provide in substance that when a recognizance is forfeited, the county solicitor shall begin proceedings “for the recovery of such forfeiture.”
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Belknap County v. Laconia, 116 A. 434, 80 N.H. 251, 1922 N.H. LEXIS 1 (N.H. 1922).
116 A. 434 (Belknap County v. Laconia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Patten v. Mitton
300 A.2d 521 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1973)