Belknap County v. Laconia

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Belknap County v. Laconia

116 A. 434, 80 N.H. 251, 1922 N.H. LEXIS 1

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJanuary 3, 1922

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 116 A. 434 (Belknap County v. Laconia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Belknap County v. Laconia, 116 A. 434, 80 N.H. 251, 1922 N.H. LEXIS 1 (N.H. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Young, J.

As the defendant agreed that the finding of the superior court should be final, it takes nothing by its exception; and that would also be true, if it had not made that agreement. P. S., c. 252, s. 31; Laws 1903, c. 28, s. 2, provide in substance that when a recognizance is forfeited, the county solicitor shall begin proceedings “for the recovery of such forfeiture.”

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young, J.

As the defendant agreed that the finding of the superior court should be final, it takes nothing by its exception; and that would also be true, if it had not made that agreement. P. S., c. 252, s. 31; Laws 1903, c. 28, s. 2, provide in substance that when a recognizance is forfeited, the county solicitor shall begin proceedings “for the recovery of such forfeiture.”

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 A. 434, 80 N.H. 251, 1922 N.H. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belknap-county-v-laconia-nh-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack