Belkin v. Middle Country Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Belkin v. Middle Country Central School District

261 A.D.2d 563, 691 N.Y.S.2d 84, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5688

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 24, 1999·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated April 28, 1998, which granted the respective motions of the defendants to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The plaintiff Anna M. Belkin was injured when her foot became caught in a two-inch gap in the riser of a staircase which was part of playground equipment on the premises of the Holbrook Road Elementary School, where she had taken her children to play.

The defendants established that the playground equipment was built for young children according to specifications. The plaintiffs’ contention that the design was inherently dangerous for its intended use is unsupported by legally-competent proof (see, Prosser v County of Erie, 244 AD2d 942; Pinzon v City of New York, 197 AD2d 680; McCarthy v State of New York, 167 AD2d 516; Dolan v City of New York, 5 AD2d 300). O’Brien, J. P., Goldstein, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated April 28, 1998, which granted the respective motions of the defendants to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The plaintiff Anna M. Belkin was injured when her foot became caught in a two-inch gap in the riser of a staircase which was part of playground equipment on the premises of the Holbrook Road Elementary School, where she had taken her children to play.

The defendants established that the playground equipment was built for young children according to specifications. The plaintiffs’ contention that the design was inherently dangerous for its intended use is unsupported by legally-competent proof (see, Prosser v County of Erie, 244 AD2d 942; Pinzon v City of New York, 197 AD2d 680; McCarthy v State of New York, 167 AD2d 516; Dolan v City of New York, 5 AD2d 300). O’Brien, J. P., Goldstein, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Belkin v. Middle Country Central School District, 261 A.D.2d 563, 691 N.Y.S.2d 84, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

261 A.D.2d 563 (Belkin v. Middle Country Central School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related