Belk v. State

22 S.E.2d 332, 68 Ga. App. 130, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 63
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 9, 1942
Docket29847; 29848
StatusPublished

This text of 22 S.E.2d 332 (Belk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Belk v. State, 22 S.E.2d 332, 68 Ga. App. 130, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 63 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Clyde Belk and J. B. Hightower were jointly indicted for making intoxicating and alcoholic liquor. They were tried together and both were convicted of the offense charged. Each defendant filed a separate motion for new trial. Both motions were overruled and those judgments are assigned as error. The evidence for the State (the defendants introduced none) amply authorized the verdict in each case, and the court did not err in overruling the motions for new trial which embraced the general grounds only.

Judgments affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur. Lester Dickson, for plaintiffs in error. Boy Leathers, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.E.2d 332, 68 Ga. App. 130, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belk-v-state-gactapp-1942.