Belk v. Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission

Eighth Circuit

Belk v. Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission

431 F. App'x 519

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2011·No. No. 09-2598·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard Belk appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment discrimination action. After careful de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir.2006), we agree that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Richard Belk appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment discrimination action. After careful de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir.2006), we agree that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Belk v. Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission, 431 F. App'x 519 (8th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

431 F. App'x 519 (Belk v. Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related