Belk v. Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission

Eighth Circuit

Belk v. Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission

431 F. App'x 519

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedOctober 4, 2011

DocketNo. 09-2598

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 431 F. App'x 519 (Belk v. Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Belk v. Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission, 431 F. App'x 519 (8th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard Belk appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment discrimination action. After careful de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir.2006), we agree that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Richard Belk appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment discrimination action. After careful de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir.2006), we agree that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

431 F. App'x 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belk-v-missouri-highways-transportation-commission-ca8-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack