Beline v. Beline

563 So. 2d 217, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4758, 1990 WL 91915
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 5, 1990·No. No. 89-1864·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court, given the particular factual circumstances of this case and the considerable discretion vested in the trial court under Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203 (Fla.1983); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., JR., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beline v. Beline, 563 So. 2d 217, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4758, 1990 WL 91915 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

563 So. 2d 217 (Beline v. Beline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kuvin v. Kuvin
442 So. 2d 203 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)