Belinda Orona v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-11-00103-CR
Belinda Orona, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF CALDWELL COUNTY NO. 39195, HONORABLE EDWARD L. JARRETT, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Belinda Orona perfected an appeal from a conviction for resisting arrest. The clerk’s
fee has not been paid and the clerk’s record has not been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a).
Because there was a question as to whether Orona is presently indigent, the Court
abated the appeal for a hearing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.04 (West Supp. 2010).
Following the hearing, the trial court found that appellant is not indigent. The Court subsequently
notified both appellant and her attorney of record that the appeal would be dismissed if the clerk’s
fee was not paid by July 5, 2011. The fee has not been paid. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
__________________________________________
Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: July 29, 2011
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Belinda Orona v. State (Belinda Orona v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.