Belinda Dawn Tidwell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 28, 2012·No. 01-12-00298-CR·Published

Opinion

Order issued December 28, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Appellant’s retained counsel has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5 because counsel has reviewed the appellate record and concluded that the appeal lacks merit and is frivolous.

Only an appointed counsel in a criminal appeal is required to file an Anders brief if counsel determines that the appeal is without merit and is frivolous; retained counsel is not required to do so. See Knotts v. State, 31 S.W.3d 821, 822 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, order); Nguyen v. State, 11 S.W.3d 376, 378 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, no pet.). A retained attorney, upon determining that an appeal is frivolous, must so inform this Court and seek leave to withdraw by filing a motion complying with Rule 6.5. See Knotts, 31 S.W.3d at 822; Nyuyen, 11 S.W.3d at 378.

Rule 6.5 requires that counsel, by copy of the motion, apprise appellant of certain facts. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a)(1)-(4). Appellant’s retained counsel has met the rule 6.5 requirements and certified to this Court that appellant has been notified that she may exercise either (1) her right to retain other counsel, or (2) her right to move for an extension of time to file a pro se brief. See Knotts, 31 S.W.3d at 822.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Nyuyen, 11 S.W.3d at 379–80.

We notify appellant at her last known address, as provided in counsel's motion, that her brief is due in this Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order. Unless appellant retains counsel who files a brief on or before that date, or unless by that date a motion for extension of time to file a pro se brief is filed in this Court and granted, this appeal will be set for submission and considered by the Court without briefs on the record alone.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belinda Dawn Tidwell v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Belinda Dawn Tidwell v. State (Belinda Dawn Tidwell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nguyen v. State
11 S.W.3d 376 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Knotts v. State
31 S.W.3d 821 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)