Belinda Baldwin and American Consumer Solutions, Inc. v. R.W. Redden
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-12-00520-CV
BELINDA BALDWIN AND APPELLANTS AMERICAN CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
V.
R.W. REDDEN APPELLEE
------------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On May 1, 2013, we notified appellants that their brief had not been filed
as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.
38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless
appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellants' brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.
DELIVERED: June 27, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Belinda Baldwin and American Consumer Solutions, Inc. v. R.W. Redden (Belinda Baldwin and American Consumer Solutions, Inc. v. R.W. Redden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.