Belinda Ann Baker v. T.E. MacKnight Detective the Richmond Police Department

900 F.2d 249

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 13, 1990
• Docket: 89-7236
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

900 F.2d 249
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Belinda Ann BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
T.E. MACKNIGHT, Detective; the Richmond Police Department
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-7236.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 5, 1990.
Decided: March 21, 1990.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied April 13, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-520-N)

Belinda Ann Baker, appellant pro se.

G. Timothy Oksman, Michele Anne Gillette, City Attorney's Office, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Belinda Ann Baker seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Baker v. MacKnight, CA-89-520-N (E.D.Va. Nov. 17, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED