Belgrano v. Finkelstein

493 So. 2d 543, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1930, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9574
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 9, 1986
DocketNo. 85-2514
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 493 So. 2d 543 (Belgrano v. Finkelstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Belgrano v. Finkelstein, 493 So. 2d 543, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1930, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9574 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by defendant Luisa Belgrano questions the correctness of a final judgment of deficiency entered against her and others not parties to this appeal in a mortgage foreclosure action.

It is appéllant Belgrano’s contention1 that the record clearly shows that the value of the property foreclosed and bid on at the foreclosure sale by the plaintiffs/appellees Michael Finkelstein, Laura Finkelstein and Fred Bossert was worth far in excess of the amount owed to appellees and that the court abused its discretion in awarding ap-pellees a deficiency judgment. We agree. See Barnard v. First National Bank of Okaloosa County, 482 So.2d 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Wilson v. Adams & Fusselle, Inc., 467 So.2d 345 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

The final judgment of deficiency is, accordingly, reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Community Bank of Homestead v. Valois
570 So. 2d 300 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
493 So. 2d 543, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1930, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belgrano-v-finkelstein-fladistctapp-1986.