Belgrano v. Finkelstein

493 So. 2d 543, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1930, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9574
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 1986·No. No. 85-2514·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal by defendant Luisa Belgrano questions the correctness of a final judgment of deficiency entered against her and others not parties to this appeal in a mortgage foreclosure action.

It is appéllant Belgrano’s contention1 that the record clearly shows that the value of the property foreclosed and bid on at the foreclosure sale by the plaintiffs/appellees Michael Finkelstein, Laura Finkelstein and Fred Bossert was worth far in excess of the amount owed to appellees and that the court abused its discretion in awarding ap-pellees a deficiency judgment. We agree. See Barnard v. First National Bank of Okaloosa County, 482 So.2d 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Wilson v. Adams & Fusselle, Inc., 467 So.2d 345 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

The final judgment of deficiency is, accordingly, reversed.

Reversed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Belgrano v. Finkelstein, 493 So. 2d 543, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1930, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9574 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

493 So. 2d 543 (Belgrano v. Finkelstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Community Bank of Homestead v. Valois
570 So. 2d 300 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)