Belgram v. Krueger
46 So. 3d 120, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15590, 2010 WL 4024711
This text of 46 So. 3d 120 (Belgram v. Krueger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Belgram v. Krueger, 46 So. 3d 120, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15590, 2010 WL 4024711 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
Opinion
We conclude, as the trial court did, that the escrow agreement entered into by the parties was clear and unambiguous. See Abis v. Tudin, D.V.M., P.A., 18 So.3d 666 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (whether ambiguity exists is question of law). Based on the undisputed facts in the record, Appellees were entitled to summary judgment.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Abis v. Tudin, D.V.M., P.A.
18 So. 3d 666 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
46 So. 3d 120, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15590, 2010 WL 4024711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belgram-v-krueger-fladistctapp-2010.