Belgram v. Krueger

46 So. 3d 120, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15590, 2010 WL 4024711

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude, as the trial court did, that the escrow agreement entered into by the parties was clear and unambiguous. See Abis v. Tudin, D.V.M., P.A., 18 So.3d 666 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (whether ambiguity exists is question of law). Based on the undisputed facts in the record, Appellees were entitled to summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

LAWSON, EVANDER, and COHEN, JJ., concur.