Belford Trucking Co. v. Park

174 So. 2d 398, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3486
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 21, 1965
DocketNo. 33596
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 So. 2d 398 (Belford Trucking Co. v. Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Belford Trucking Co. v. Park, 174 So. 2d 398, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3486 (Fla. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged, Fla.App., 165 So.2d 819, and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THOMAS and ROBERTS, JJ, dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Florida Bar v. King
174 So. 2d 398 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 So. 2d 398, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belford-trucking-co-v-park-fla-1965.