Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Belfiglio v. Belfiglio

Belfiglio v. Belfiglio

99 A.D.2d 462, 469 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16632
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 3, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 99 A.D.2d 462 (Belfiglio v. Belfiglio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Belfiglio v. Belfiglio, 99 A.D.2d 462, 469 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16632 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, defendant husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (SSlifkin, J.), entered April 14,1983 as amended April 18,1983, as awarded plaintiff wife the sum of $450 per week in temporary maintenance and child support. Order as amended affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs. The nine specific factors enumerated in section 236 (part B, subd 6, par a) of the Domestic Relations Law do not govern temporary maintenance applications. Accordingly, Special Term, in awarding temporary maintenance, was not obligated to consider them (Liss v Liss, 87 AD2d 681, 682). Special Term’s decision, in which it set forth the reasons for the determination reached, complied with the statutory directives (Domestic Relations Law, § 236, part B, subd 6, par b; subd 7, par b). Temporary maintenance is designed to insure that the needy spouse is provided with sufficient funds to meet his or her reasonable needs pending trial (cf. Rossman v Rossman, 91 AD2d 1036; Jorgensen v Jorgensen, 86 AD2d 861). Review of the record indicates that the award is not excessive. Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Steven Hoyt and Lesley Hoyt
196 A.3d 85 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2018)
Leung v. Moosikasuwan
57 A.D.3d 952 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Calicchia v. Calicchia
204 A.D.2d 506 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Rosenthal v. Rosenthal
173 A.D.2d 453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
LoMuscio-Hamparian v. Hamparian
137 A.D.2d 500 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Sass v. Sass
129 A.D.2d 622 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Cohen v. Cohen
129 A.D.2d 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Clancy v. Clancy
122 A.D.2d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Nicolais v. Nicolais
120 A.D.2d 655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Crowley v. Crowley
120 A.D.2d 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Fricke v. Fricke
119 A.D.2d 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Groner v. Groner
113 A.D.2d 822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Catania v. Catania
111 A.D.2d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Romanoff v. Romanoff
111 A.D.2d 158 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Hildenbiddle v. Hildenbiddle
110 A.D.2d 819 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Chachkes v. Chachkes
107 A.D.2d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Stern v. Stern
106 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Meyer v. Meyer
102 A.D.2d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.2d 462, 469 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belfiglio-v-belfiglio-nyappdiv-1984.