Belen Vargas v. Mariano Vargas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 15, 2009
Docket13-07-00586-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Belen Vargas v. Mariano Vargas (Belen Vargas v. Mariano Vargas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Belen Vargas v. Mariano Vargas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-07-00586-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________ __________

BELEN VARGAS, DECEASED, Appellant,



v.



MARIANO VARGAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 24th District Court

of De Witt County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Yañez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Pro se appellant, Belen Vargas, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 24th District Court of De Witt County, Texas, in cause number 07-01-20,545. The record was filed and appellant's brief became due, but no appellant's brief has been filed. On March 30, 2009, this Court was advised by appellant's sister, Linda Perez (Perez), that appellant died on October 5, 2008.

On June 8, 2009, the Clerk of this Court spoke with Perez regarding the administration of appellant's estate. Perez indicated that she was in the process of seeking legal counsel to appoint a legal representative for appellant's estate and determine if the representative, if any, and/or her heirs desire to prosecute the appeal. Perez stated that appellant had no children, was divorced, and that appellant's siblings are the closest living relatives. The Clerk of the Court sent a letter to Perez requiring her to inform the Court by July 31, 2009, whether there would be an administration of appellant's estate and whether there would be a legal successor to appellant who would be prosecuting the appeal to conclusion. Perez was advised that if the Court did not receive a response, the appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. To date, the Court has not received any information regarding the administration of appellant's estate.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered

and filed this the 15th day of October, 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Belen Vargas v. Mariano Vargas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/belen-vargas-v-mariano-vargas-texapp-2009.